Bodybuilding: Daily Discussion Thread: 08/26/2020 |
- Daily Discussion Thread: 08/26/2020
- Training Thursdays
- Golden era is top heavy, not athletic/aesthetic looking
| Daily Discussion Thread: 08/26/2020 Posted: 26 Aug 2020 04:00 PM PDT Feel free to post things in the Daily Discussion Thread that don't warrant a subreddit-level discussion. Although most of our posting rules will be relaxed here, you should still consider your audience when posting. Most importantly, show respect to your fellow redditors. General redditiquette always applies. [link] [comments] |
| Posted: 27 Aug 2020 02:00 AM PDT Submit form checks, programs, questions about programs and program success stories (especially if you saw growth from it). [link] [comments] |
| Golden era is top heavy, not athletic/aesthetic looking Posted: 26 Aug 2020 07:12 PM PDT I've seen people commenting on how the golden era has that functional athletic look, hence more aethetic. I totaly disagree. The golden era is top heavy, with those small legs as compared to their upper body, they would be slow as heck, and have poor body balance To me the the 90's until today's era actually nailed the proportions better than the golden era, the right proportions for their mass. Big upper body and big lower body. Arnold has chicken legs compared to his upper body [link] [comments] |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Bodybuilding - everybody wants to be a bodybuilder. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
No comments:
Post a Comment