Bodybuilding: Daily Discussion Thread: 01/19/2021

---

• Daily Discussion Thread: 01/19/2021
• Chris Bumstead 1 year progress
• Dorian Yates complementing Robby Robinson in the comments
• Newbie Tuesdays
• The Era of Aesthetic
• Why do old school (60’s, 70’s, and most 80’s) bodybuilders look different muscularly than new age (2000’s to present day) bodybuilders?

Daily Discussion Thread: 01/19/2021 Posted: 19 Jan 2021 07:00 AM PST Feel free to post things in the Daily Discussion Thread that don't warrant a subreddit-level discussion. Although most of our posting rules will be relaxed here, you should still consider your audience when posting. Most importantly, show respect to your fellow redditors. General redditiquette always applies. submitted by /u/bodybuildingbot [link] [comments]

Chris Bumstead 1 year progress Posted: 18 Jan 2021 09:26 AM PST submitted by /u/Frosty_Goose_2048 [link] [comments]

Dorian Yates complementing Robby Robinson in the comments Posted: 18 Jan 2021 12:41 PM PST submitted by /u/KO_SLICE [link] [comments]

Newbie Tuesdays Posted: 19 Jan 2021 01:00 AM PST Ask all newbie BB related questions here. submitted by /u/bodybuildingbot [link] [comments]

The Era of Aesthetic Posted: 18 Jan 2021 10:14 AM PST With the coming of Shawn Roden, Brandon Curry and now Big Ramy (despite being big he has a good waist and the conditioning he brought last year was great) where do you think the direction of bodybuilding is going towards? Is aesthetics now a necessary in the open class to have a pretty physique? What do you guys think? submitted by /u/JonesTrapMaster [link] [comments]

Why do old school (60’s, 70’s, and most 80’s) bodybuilders look different muscularly than new age (2000’s to present day) bodybuilders? Posted: 17 Jan 2021 09:17 PM PST I'm not sure if there is a definitive objective answer to this but recently rewatching pumping iron for the 100th time, I'm just stuck on the question of why guys like Arnold, Lee Haney, Serge Nubret, Franco Columbo etc. look vastly different to the new guys we have today. I'm not talking about sheer mass or symmetry and proportions. That's obvious and it just results in how the sport of bodybuilding has changed. But the old school guys all had this absolute paper skin shredded look while still maintaining this odd aesthetic smoothness and fullness to their muscles that made them look insanely full and round. It's a huge difference from the bodybuilding we see today where even in classic physique, the competitors are very grainy and striated and seem to just have these blocky muscles that seem almost inhuman. Much different than the aesthetic Greek statue-esque bodybuilders of the golden age. Is this a result of gear cycles, supplementation, training differences, diet, or something else? Curious to hear some opinions and ideas. Thanks submitted by /u/Beginning-Yak-3168 [link] [comments]

You are subscribed to email updates from Bodybuilding - everybody wants to be a bodybuilder. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.	Email delivery powered by Google
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States